(Mis)appropriation Art?: Copyright and Data Protection implications of 'CCTV Sniffing' as Art

Smita Kheria; Daithi Mac Sithigh; Judith Rauhofer; Burkhard Schafer

(Mis)appropriation Art? Copyright and Data Protection implications of 'CCTV Sniffing' as Art

Smita Kheria, Daithi Mac Sithigh, Judith Rauhofer, Burkhard Schafer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

This paper discusses the legal implications of CCTV sniffing and war walking, legally problematic uses of wireless networks, for the purpose of art. Using Bitnik’s “surveillance chess” as starting point, it asks if new forms of computer enabled art require new forms of protection, especially in countries without constitutional guarantee of freedom of art.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Abstraktion und Applikation
Editors	E Schweighofer, F Kummer, W Hötzendorfer
Publisher	OCG
Pages	489-98
Number of pages	10
Publication status	Published - 2013

Access to Document

Kheria, Mac Sithigh, Rauhofer & Schafer (2013) - (Mis)appropriation Art? Copyright and Data protection implications of "CCTV sniffing" as art.
© Kheria, S., Mac Sithigh, D., Rauhofer, J., & Schafer, B. (2013). (Mis)appropriation Art?: Copyright and Data Protection implications of 'CCTV Sniffing' as Art. In E. Schweighofer, F. Kummer, & W. Hötzendorfer (Eds.), Abstraktion und Applikation. (pp. 489-98). OCG.

http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/news/newsitem.aspx?blogentryref=9113

1 Working paper

“CCTV Sniffing”: Copyright and Data Protection Implications
Kheria, S., Mac Sithigh, D., Rauhofer, J. & Schafer, B., Mar 2013, CREATe Working Papers, 12 p. (CREATe Working Papers; no. 2013/2).
Research output: Working paper

Open Access
File

Cite this

@inproceedings{95ed96090aef419b89f8e02605e1d671,

title = "(Mis)appropriation Art?: Copyright and Data Protection implications of 'CCTV Sniffing' as Art",

abstract = "This paper discusses the legal implications of CCTV sniffing and war walking, legally problematic uses of wireless networks, for the purpose of art. Using Bitnik{\textquoteright}s “surveillance chess” as starting point, it asks if new forms of computer enabled art require new forms of protection, especially in countries without constitutional guarantee of freedom of art.",

author = "Smita Kheria and \{Mac Sithigh\}, Daithi and Judith Rauhofer and Burkhard Schafer",

year = "2013",

language = "English",

pages = "489--98",

editor = "E Schweighofer and F Kummer and W H{\"o}tzendorfer",

booktitle = "Abstraktion und Applikation",

publisher = "OCG",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - (Mis)appropriation Art?

T2 - Copyright and Data Protection implications of 'CCTV Sniffing' as Art

AU - Kheria, Smita

AU - Mac Sithigh, Daithi

AU - Rauhofer, Judith

AU - Schafer, Burkhard

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper discusses the legal implications of CCTV sniffing and war walking, legally problematic uses of wireless networks, for the purpose of art. Using Bitnik’s “surveillance chess” as starting point, it asks if new forms of computer enabled art require new forms of protection, especially in countries without constitutional guarantee of freedom of art.

AB - This paper discusses the legal implications of CCTV sniffing and war walking, legally problematic uses of wireless networks, for the purpose of art. Using Bitnik’s “surveillance chess” as starting point, it asks if new forms of computer enabled art require new forms of protection, especially in countries without constitutional guarantee of freedom of art.

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 489

EP - 498

BT - Abstraktion und Applikation

A2 - Schweighofer, E

A2 - Kummer, F

A2 - Hötzendorfer, W

PB - OCG

ER -

(Mis)appropriation Art? Copyright and Data Protection implications of 'CCTV Sniffing' as Art

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Research output

“CCTV Sniffing”: Copyright and Data Protection Implications

Cite this