More on normic support and the criminal standard of proof

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, I respond to Marcello Di Bello’s criticisms of the ‘normic account’ of the criminal standard of proof (Di Bello, 2019). In so doing, I further elaborate on what the normic account predicts about certain significant legal categories of evidence, including DNA and fingerprint evidence and eyewitness identifications.
Original languageEnglish
JournalMind
Early online date24 May 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 May 2021

Keywords

  • normic support
  • beyond reasonable doubt
  • DNA evidence
  • fingerprint evidence
  • eyewitness identification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'More on normic support and the criminal standard of proof'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this