Multi-objective Model Checking of Markov Decision Processes

Kousha Etessami, Marta Z. Kwiatkowska, Moshe Y. Vardi, Mihalis Yannakakis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract / Description of output

We study and provide efficient algorithms for multi-objective model checking problems for Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). Given an MDP, M, and given multiple linear-time (ω-regular or LTL) properties ϕ i , and probabilities r i  ∈ [0,1], i = 1,...,k, we ask whether there exists a strategy σ for the controller such that, for all i, the probability that a trajectory of M controlled by σ satisfies ϕ i is at least r i . We provide an algorithm that decides whether there exists such a strategy and if so produces it, and which runs in time polynomial in the size of the MDP. Such a strategy may require the use of both randomization and memory. We also consider more general multi-objective ω-regular queries, which we motivate with an application to assume-guarantee compositional reasoning for probabilistic systems.

Note that there can be trade-offs between different properties: satisfying property ϕ 1 with high probability may necessitate satisfying ϕ 2 with low probability. Viewing this as a multi-objective optimization problem, we want information about the “trade-off curve” or Pareto curve for maximizing the probabilities of different properties. We show that one can compute an approximate Pareto curve with respect to a set of ω-regular properties in time polynomial in the size of the MDP.

Our quantitative upper bounds use LP methods. We also study qualitative multi-objective model checking problems, and we show that these can be analysed by purely graph-theoretic methods, even though the strategies may still require both randomization and memory.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTACAS
PublisherSpringer-Verlag GmbH
Number of pages16
Publication statusPublished - 2007


Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-objective Model Checking of Markov Decision Processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this