My word is my bond: Unilateral promises again

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle


The paper reviews recent case law on the subject of unilateral promises in Scots law, in particular Regus (Maxim) Ltd v. Bank of Scotland plc [2013] CSIH 12, 2013 SC 331, Royal Bank of Scotland v Carlyle [2015] UKSC 13, 2015 SC (UKSC) 93, Landvest PCC Ltd v The Most Reverend Leo Cushley and others [2016] CSOH 129, and Fisher v Applied Drilling Technology International Ltd [2016] CSOH 108. In particular it is suggested that the Landvest case may have adopted an unduly narrow and technical approach in holding that the crucial statements in that case were not promises. A more commercially realistic approach is to be found in the Carlyle and Fisher cases, for which there is also valuable authority in the dicta of Lord President Gill in the Regus Maxim case. The author reiterates a long-standing argument that, properly understood, the doctrine of unilateral promise provides a very useful tool in the appropriate analysis and resolution of commercial disputes.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages7
Specialist publicationScots Law Times (News)
Publication statusPublished - 20 Sep 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'My word is my bond: Unilateral promises again'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this