Mycobacterium bovis in rural Tanzania: risk factors for infection in human and cattle populations

Sarah Cleaveland, Darren J Shaw, Sayoki G Mfinanga, Gabriel Shirima, Rudovick R Kazwala, Ernest Eblate, Michael Sharp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Although bovine tuberculosis is widespread throughout Africa, very little is known about risk factors for Mycobacterium bovis infection in either human or cattle populations. A human case-control study was conducted in northern Tanzania, comparing risk factors and prevalence of cattle interdermal test positives of cases (cervical adenitis cases from which M. bovis was isolated) with age- and sex-matched controls (selected at random from potential hospital attendees within the community). A cattle cross-sectional study was also set-up involving 27 villages selected at random in four districts, with 10,549 cattle and 622 herds tested, and questionnaire surveys conducted in 239 households. M. bovis was confirmed in seven of 65 (10.8%) human cervical adenitis cases, of which only one came from a household owning infected cattle. M. bovis in human patients was associated with families in which a confirmed diagnosis of tuberculosis had previously been made (p100m) from neighbours (p=0.003). In cattle, overall prevalence of intradermal test positives was low at 0.9% (0.70-1.06%), but widespread, with 11.8% (8.44-13.17%) herds containing at least one reactor. Prevalence of intradermal test positives increased significantly with cattle age (p50 cattle in the herd (p=0.024); herds housed inside at night (p=0.021) and herds in contact with wildlife (p=0.041). Furthermore, villages that experienced annual flooding had a higher prevalence of infection (p=0.043).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-43
Number of pages14
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2007


  • Mycobacterium
  • Tubercolosis
  • Risk Factors
  • Tanzania
  • Cattle


Dive into the research topics of 'Mycobacterium bovis in rural Tanzania: risk factors for infection in human and cattle populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this