Negotiation between parents: does the timing of mate loss affect female compensation in Nicrophorus vespilloides?

Per T. Smiseth, S Musa, A J Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Facultative adjustments in care are usually interpreted as a form of negotiation between the parents over how much care each should provide. Previous research on the burying beetle, Nicrophonts vespilloides, shows that males but not females appear to adjust their levels of care following negotiation. However, the importance of negotiation is likely to decrease over the course of a breeding attempt, and thus the timing of mate removal might affect the degree to which females adjust their levels of care. We therefore performed an experimental study where we removed N. vespilloides males at different intervals; before the female was provided the resources needed for breeding, 24 It after receiving resources, at the time of larval hatching, or after the parental care period. We monitored the effects on levels of female care of the offspring when parental care is at its highest. We found that the timing of mate removal had a significant effect on the time females spent maintaining the carcass. but not on the time females spent providing food for the offspring or processing carrion. Our findings suggest that, in N. vespilloides, female decisions about how much care to provide involves negotiation, although the importance of negotiation decreases towards die end of breeding attempts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-301
Number of pages9
JournalBehaviour
Volume143
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2006

Keywords

  • ORANGE-TUFTED SUNBIRD
  • BURYING BEETLES
  • PATERNAL CARE
  • MALE-REMOVAL
  • REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS
  • BEHAVIORAL DYNAMICS
  • BIPARENTAL CARE
  • SEX-DIFFERENCES
  • BROOD-CARE
  • MALES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Negotiation between parents: does the timing of mate loss affect female compensation in Nicrophorus vespilloides?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this