TY - JOUR
T1 - Neonatal mortality risk for vulnerable newborn types in 15 countries using 125.5 million nationwide birth outcome records, 2000 to 2020
AU - the National Vulnerable Newborn Mortality Collaborative Group and Vulnerable Newborn Measurement Core Group
AU - Suárez-Idueta, Lorena
AU - Blencowe, Hannah
AU - Okwaraji, Yemisrach B.
AU - Yargawa, Judith
AU - Bradley, Ellen
AU - Gordon, Adrienne
AU - Flenady, Vicki
AU - Paixão, Enny S.
AU - Barreto, Maurício L.
AU - Lisonkova, Sarka
AU - Wen, Qi
AU - Velebil, Petr
AU - Jírová, Jitka
AU - Horváth-Puhó, Erzsebet
AU - Sørensen, Henrik Toft
AU - Sakkeus, Luule
AU - Abuladze, Liili
AU - Yunis, Khalid A.
AU - Al Bizri, Ayah
AU - Barranco, Arturo
AU - Broeders, Lisa
AU - van Dijk, Aimée E.
AU - Alyafei, Fawziya
AU - Olukade, Tawa O.
AU - Razaz, Neda
AU - Söderling, Jonas
AU - Smith, Lucy K.
AU - Draper, Elizabeth S.
AU - Lowry, Estelle
AU - Rowland, Neil
AU - Wood, Rachael
AU - Monteath, Kirsten
AU - Pereyra, Isabel
AU - Pravia, Gabriella
AU - Ohuma, Eric O.
AU - Lawn, Joy E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This analysis was funded by Children's Investment Fund Foundation, prime grant 1803‐02535. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation of the paper. ESP and MLB received funding from Wellcome Trust UK (202912/B/16/Z). NR received funding from Swedish Research Council (VR 2979/2020). ED received funding from the MBRRACE‐UK programme.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2023/5/8
Y1 - 2023/5/8
N2 - Objective: To compare neonatal mortality associated with six novel vulnerable newborn types in 125.5 million livebirths across 15 countries, 2000 to 2020.Design: Population-based, multi-country study. Setting: National data systems in 15 middle and high-income countries.Methods: We used individual-level datasets identified for the Vulnerable Newborn Measurement Collaboration. We examined the contribution to neonatal mortality of six newborn types combining gestational age (preterm, PT vs term, T) and size-for-gestational age (small (SGA, 90th centile)) according to INTERGROWTH-21st newborn standards. Newborn babies with PT or SGA were defined as small and T+LGA was considered as large. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and population attributable risks (PAR%) for the six newborn types. Main Outcome Measures Mortality of six newborn types Results Of 125.5 million livebirths analysed, risk ratios were highest amongst PT+SGA (median: 67.2, Interquartile Range, IQR, 45.6, 73.9), PT+AGA (median: 34.3, IQR, 23.9, 37.5), and PT+LGA (median: 28.3, IQR, 18.4, 32.3). At the population level, PT+AGA was the greatest contributor to newborn mortality (median PAR%: 53.7, IQR, 44.5, 54.9). Mortality risk was highest among newborns Conclusion Preterm newborn types were the most vulnerable, and associated with highest mortality, particularly with co-existence of preterm and SGA. As PT+AGA is more prevalent, it is responsible for greatest burden of neonatal deaths at population level.
AB - Objective: To compare neonatal mortality associated with six novel vulnerable newborn types in 125.5 million livebirths across 15 countries, 2000 to 2020.Design: Population-based, multi-country study. Setting: National data systems in 15 middle and high-income countries.Methods: We used individual-level datasets identified for the Vulnerable Newborn Measurement Collaboration. We examined the contribution to neonatal mortality of six newborn types combining gestational age (preterm, PT vs term, T) and size-for-gestational age (small (SGA, 90th centile)) according to INTERGROWTH-21st newborn standards. Newborn babies with PT or SGA were defined as small and T+LGA was considered as large. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and population attributable risks (PAR%) for the six newborn types. Main Outcome Measures Mortality of six newborn types Results Of 125.5 million livebirths analysed, risk ratios were highest amongst PT+SGA (median: 67.2, Interquartile Range, IQR, 45.6, 73.9), PT+AGA (median: 34.3, IQR, 23.9, 37.5), and PT+LGA (median: 28.3, IQR, 18.4, 32.3). At the population level, PT+AGA was the greatest contributor to newborn mortality (median PAR%: 53.7, IQR, 44.5, 54.9). Mortality risk was highest among newborns Conclusion Preterm newborn types were the most vulnerable, and associated with highest mortality, particularly with co-existence of preterm and SGA. As PT+AGA is more prevalent, it is responsible for greatest burden of neonatal deaths at population level.
U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.17506
DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.17506
M3 - Article
SN - 1470-0328
JO - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
JF - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
ER -