Norms of equality reduce prejudice towards migrants, but only among conservatives

Feiteng Long*, Ruthie Pliskin, Daan Scheepers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

People are sensitive to norms, but under what conditions promoting anti-prejudice norms reduce prejudice remains unclear. Three studies among Dutch participants (total N = 700) examined the effects of (in)equality norms on prejudice towards migrants. To gain greater clarity, we also examined how potential boundary conditions—namely economic and social ideologies—moderate this relationship. A norm of equality was measured (Study 1) or manipulated (Studies 2a and 2b). In Study 1, a perceived norm of equality predicted lower prejudice towards migrants, operationalised as cold feelings, social distance, and perceived outgroup threat, through the increased personal endorsement of equality, particularly among (economic) rightists. In two experiments (Studies 2a and 2b), as well as in a joint analysis of both studies, we found that inducing an equality norm (vs. not) mitigated prejudice towards migrants, but only among (social) rightists. These findings highlight the positive role of social norms promoting equality in combating prejudice and the importance of considering boundary conditions for this role, such as ideology. We discuss the implications for theory and practice regarding prejudice (reduction). Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2836
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Community and Applied Social Psychology
Volume34
Issue number4
Early online date3 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • ideology
  • prejudice
  • social norms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Norms of equality reduce prejudice towards migrants, but only among conservatives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this