Abstract
Why do skill formation systems put SMEs at greater disadvantage in some countries than others vis-à-vis large employers? By comparing vocational education and training (VET) institutions and their differential effect on firms of different sizes across three countries (UK, Italy, and Germany), we show that the design of vocational training institutions has profound implications for shaping the ability of SMEs to use institutions as resources. In particular, quasi-market institutions in Britain amplify SMEs’ disadvantage, while non-market coordinating institutions in Italy and Germany narrow the gap between SMEs and large employers. By unpacking the comparative disadvantage of SMEs, we offer important nuances to the argument that institutions help firms coordinate their business activities in different varieties of capitalism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 35 |
| Journal | MPIfG Discussion Paper Series |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 17 Apr 2020 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- vocational education and training (VET)
- varieties of capitalism
- comparative political economy
- firm size
- small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)