Now you see it, now you don’t. How do contemporary artists address the problematics of visualisation through re-inventing both analogue and digital techniques of printmaking? Presentation and publication, Latent Image Conference, Edinburgh

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Abstract

Printmaking as one of the oldest image making technologies is often omitted from debates on contemporary artistic media. This paper aims to contribute to addressing this lacuna.Drawing on Georges Didi-Huberman’s conception of the imprint, the paper investigates the artistic interactions between and disruptions of technological and material affordances, medial conventions as well as iconographic and formal means of the four chosen artists. Importantly, while foregrounding mutability rather than a habitually presumed stability, the artists ─ Christiane Baumgartner, Susan Collins, Oscar Muñoz, Andrea Büttner ─ craft new, intensified materialities. Through such means they contribute to an unpicking of the ostensible will to mastery and transparency, especially (but not only) of digital images. Generating thus culturally and socially necessary representational and experiential ‘friction/s’ (Joselit), the specific formal and material strategies of the artists are also tied to an ethics that permits the mobilisation of ‘the anachronism of the authentic as a challenge to our present’ (Balsom, 2014,76).
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018
EventThe Latent Image: Transimage 2018 - University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Duration: 18 Apr 201820 Apr 2018
https://transimage2018.net

Conference

ConferenceThe Latent Image
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityEdinburgh
Period18/04/1820/04/18
Internet address

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Now you see it, now you don’t. How do contemporary artists address the problematics of visualisation through re-inventing both analogue and digital techniques of printmaking? Presentation and publication, Latent Image Conference, Edinburgh'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this