Abstract / Description of output
Conventional analyses of labor market fluctuations ascribe a minor role to labor force participation. We show, by contrast, that flows-based analyses imply that the participation margin accounts for around one-third of unemployment fluctuations. A novel stock-flow apparatus establishes these facts, delivering three further contributions. First, the role of the participation margin appears robust to adjustments for spurious transitions induced by reporting error. Second, conventional stocks-based analyses are subject to a stock-flow fallacy, neglecting offsetting forces of worker flows on the participation rate. Third, increases in labor force attachment among the unemployed during recessions are a leading explanation for the role of the participation margin.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 64-82 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of Monetary Economics |
Volume | 72 |
Early online date | 29 Jan 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2015 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- worker flows
- unemployment
- business cycles
- labor force participation