Abstract / Description of output
There is no doubt that the model presented here is incomplete. Many important categories, particularly negation and the adverbials, have been entirely ignored, and the treatment of Tense and the affixes is certainly inadequate. It also remains to be seen how the many constructions that have been ignored here are to be accommodated within the framework that has been outlined. However, the fact that a standard categorial lexicon, plus the four rule schemata, seems to come close to exhaustively specifying the main clause constructions of English, and also seems to explain a number of major constraints on transformations, encourages us to compare the theory with certain alternatives, and to examine its broader implications.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 517-558 |
Number of pages | 42 |
Journal | Linguistics and Philosophy |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 1982 |