Abstract / Description of output
Through our experience during a large-scale public engagement exercise in Chile we draw conclusions to adapt and improve the Critical Debate Model to an online format. We highlight the importance of epistemic opposition and structured annotation for the execution of debates, while also exploring the possibilities of automated analysis using Natural Language Processing. We conclude by describing how an online version of the Critical Debate Model could be implemented.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Competing, cooperating, deciding |
Subtitle of host publication | Towards a model of deliberative debate |
Editors | Adelino Cattani, Bruno Mastroianni |
Place of Publication | Florence |
Publisher | Firenze University Press |
Pages | 69-86 |
Number of pages | 18 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- online debate
- deliberative debate
- critical debate model