OPTIMAL: An OPTimised Imaging Mass cytometry AnaLysis framework for benchmarking segmentation and data exploration

Bethany Hunter, Ioana Nicorescu, Emma Foster, David McDonald, Gillian Hulme, Andrew Fuller, Amanda Thomson, Thibaut Goldsborough, Catherien M.U. Hilkens, Joaquim Majo, Luke Milross, Andrew Fisher, Peter Bankhead, John Wills, Paul Rees*, Andrew Filby*, George Merces*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Analysis of Imaging Mass Cytometry (IMC) data and other low-resolution multiplexed tissue imaging technologies is often confounded by poor single cell segmentation and sub-optimal approaches for data visualisation and exploration. This can lead to inaccurate identification of cell phenotypes, states or spatial relationships compared to reference data from single cell suspension technologies. To this end we have developed the “OPTIMAL” framework to benchmark any approaches for cell segmentation, parameter transformation, batch effect correction, data visualisation/clustering and spatial neighbourhood analysis. Using a panel of 27 metal-tagged antibodies recognising well characterised phenotypic and functional markers to stain the same FFPE human tonsil sample Tissue Microarray (TMA) over 12 temporally distinct batches we tested several cell segmentation models, a range of different arcsinh cofactor parameter transformation values, five different dimensionality reduction algorithms and two clustering methods. Finally we assessed the optimal approach for performing neighbourhood analysis. We found that single cell segmentation was improved by the use of an Ilastik-derived probability map but that issues with poor segmentation were only really evident after clustering and cell type/state identification and not always evident when using “classical” bi- variate data display techniques. The optimal arcsinh cofactor for parameter transformation was 1 as it maximised the statistical separation between negative and positive signal distributions and a simple Z-score normalisation step after arcsinh transformation eliminated batch effects. Of the five different dimensionality reduction approaches tested, PacMap gave the best data structure with FLOWSOM clustering out-performing Phenograph in terms of cell type identification. We also found that neighbourhood analysis was influenced by the method used for finding neighbouring cells with a “disc” pixel expansion outperforming a “bounding box” approach combined with the need for filtering objects based on size and image-edge location. Importantly OPTIMAL can be used to assess and integrate with any existing approach to IMC data analysis and, as it creates .FCS files from the segmentation output, allows for single cell exploration to be conducted using a wide variety of accessible software and algorithms familiar to conventional flow cytometrists.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCytometry Part A
Early online date26 Sept 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 26 Sept 2023

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • Imaging Mass Cytometry
  • Image analysis
  • Tissue segmentation
  • Image Cytometry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'OPTIMAL: An OPTimised Imaging Mass cytometry AnaLysis framework for benchmarking segmentation and data exploration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this