Organisational and student characteristics, fidelity, funding models, and unit costs of recovery colleges in 28 countries: a cross-sectional survey

Daniel Hayes, Holly Hunter-Brown, Elizabeth Camacho, Merly McPhilbin, Rachel A. Elliott, Amy Ronaldson, Ioannis Bakolis, Julie Repper, Sara Meddings, Lisa Brophy, Yuki Miyamoto, Stynke Castelein, Trude Gøril Klevan, Dan Elton, Jason Grant-Rowles, Yasuhiro Kotera, Claire Henderson, Mike Slade, RECOLLECT International Research Consortium, Charlotte Hanlon (Member of Consortium)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Background: Recovery colleges were developed in England to support the recovery of individuals who have mental health symptoms or mental illness. They have been founded in many countries but there has been little international research on recovery colleges and no studies investigating their staffing, fidelity, or costs. We aimed to characterise recovery colleges internationally, to understand organisational and student characteristics, fidelity, and budget. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we identified all countries in which recovery colleges exist. We repeated a cross-sectional survey done in England for recovery colleges in 28 countries. In both surveys, recovery colleges were defined as services that supported personal recovery, that were coproduced with students and staff, and where students learned collaboratively with trainers. Recovery college managers completed the survey. The survey included questions about organisational and student characteristics, fidelity to the RECOLLECT Fidelity Measure, funding models, and unit costs. Recovery colleges were grouped by country and continent and presented descriptively. We used regression models to explore continental differences in fidelity, using England as the reference group. Findings: We identified 221 recovery colleges operating across 28 countries, in five continents. Overall, 174 (79%) of 221 recovery colleges participated. Most recovery colleges scored highly on fidelity. Overall scores for fidelity (β=–2·88, 95% CI 4·44 to –1·32; p=0·0001), coproduction (odds ratio [OR] 0·10, 95% CI 0·03 to 0·33; p
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)768-779
Number of pages12
JournalThe Lancet Psychiatry
Volume10
Issue number10
Early online date19 Sept 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Organisational and student characteristics, fidelity, funding models, and unit costs of recovery colleges in 28 countries: a cross-sectional survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this