Outcomes of Patients Suspended From the National Kidney Transplant Waiting List in the United Kingdom Between 2000 and 2010

David Wallace, Matthew Robb, Winter Hughes, Rachel Johnson, Rutger Ploeg, James Neuberger, John Forsythe, Roberto Cacciola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the UK, 1 in 3 patients on the National Kidney Transplant Waiting List (NKTWL) are suspended from the list at least once during their wait. The mortality of this large cohort of patients remains underreported and poorly described.

METHODS: We linked patient records from the UK Transplant Registry to mortality data from the Office of National Statistics and evaluated the impact of a clinically induced suspension event by estimating hazard ratios (HR) that compared mortality and graft survival between those who had experienced a suspension event and those who had not.

RESULTS: Between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2010, 16.7% (2221/13 322) of all patients registered on the NKTWL were suspended. 48.0% (588/1225) of those who were suspended and who were never transplanted died, most often from cardiothoracic causes. A suspension event was associated with increased mortality from the time of listing (aHR: 1·79, 1·64-1·95) and from the time of transplantation (aHR: 1·20, 1.06-1.37, p=0005). Graft survival was also poorer in those who had been suspended (aHR: 1·13, 1·01-1·28, p=0·04).

CONCLUSIONS: Patients suspended on the NKTWL have a significantly higher rate of mortality both on the waiting list and following transplantation. Earlier prioritisation of patients at risk of experiencing a suspension event may improve their outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1654-1661
Number of pages8
JournalTransplantation
Volume104
Issue number8
Early online date23 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of Patients Suspended From the National Kidney Transplant Waiting List in the United Kingdom Between 2000 and 2010'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this