Palliation and medically assisted dying: A case study in the use of slippery slope arguments in public policy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Opponents of medically assisted dying have long appealed to ‘slippery slope’ arguments. One such slippery slope concerns palliative care: that the introduction of medically assisted dying will lead to a diminution in the quality or availability or palliative care for patients near the end of their lives. Empirical evidence from jurisdictions where assisted dying has been practiced for decades, such as Oregon and the Netherlands, indicate that such worries are largely unfounded. The failure of the palliation slope argument is nevertheless instructive with respect to how slippery slope arguments can be appraised without having to await post-facto evidence regarding the effects of a proposed change in public policy. Close attention in particular to the norms operative in a given institution and how changes to policy will interact with those norms enable slippery slopes to be credibly appraised.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Public Policy
EditorsDavid Boonin
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Chapter52
Pages691-702
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9783319939070
ISBN (Print)9783319939063
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 9 Oct 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Palliation and medically assisted dying: A case study in the use of slippery slope arguments in public policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this