Passing Through Vanity Fair: The Pilgrim's Progress in the Marketplace

Natasha Simonova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Although it is usually approached as a religious text or a precursor of the novel, John Bunyan’s The Pilgrim’s Progress was also a bestseller of its time and thus a valuable literary property, making it an important landmark in the history of authorship. This paper examines the publication history of The Pilgrim’s Progress and its sequels (by Bunyan and others) from within the context of the Restoration book trade, focusing on their paratexts and the controversies of ownership that surrounded them Despite his initial apology for writing a work of fiction, Bunyan came to assert greater authority over it, motivated first by accusations of plagiarism and then by the publication of Thomas Sherman’s Second Part. A significant role in configuring Bunyan’s authorship was also played by his publisher, Nathaniel Ponder, who—working in his own interests as the ‘proprietor’ of The Pilgrim’s Progress—repeatedly defended Bunyan’s authorial canon from piracy and spurious texts, including the anonymous Third Part brought out after Bunyan’s death.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalAuthorship
Volume2
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Passing Through Vanity Fair: The Pilgrim's Progress in the Marketplace'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this