Past Answers to Present Concerns. The Relevance of the Premodern Past for 21st Century Policy Planners: Comments on the State of the Field

John Haldon, Lee Mordechai, Andrew Dugmore, Merle Eisenberg, Georgina Endfield, Adam Izdebski, Rowan Jackson, Luke Kemp, Inga Labuhn, Thomas Mcgovern, Sarah Metcalfe, Kathleen d. Morrison, Timothy Newfield, Benjamin Trump

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

How is history relevant to the present, or indeed the future? Governments around the world have used history to inform planning and decision-making in various fields for years, but more recently it has taken on a renewed importance as governments grapple with increasingly complex challenges arising from the impacts of climatic change. Yet identifying “lessons from the past” is not straightforward. Especially in the case of big questions about historical structures and social processes, establishing precise causal relationships is complex and interpretive, making consensus difficult among specialists. A second major challenge arises over the uses of history. Historical precedent can and does play a role in some contexts in helping formulate new strategies for addressing local environmental challenges. At the national level policy-makers and politicians often look to the past for inspiration, guidance, or justification. In both respects, the cases and examples chosen are often highly selective and tend to align with pre-existing assumptions. This article briefly reviews these challenges within the context of climate change and associated environmental and sustainability issues, comments on recent work in the field, and suggests some ways forward for historians.
Original languageEnglish
Article number e923
JournalWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
Early online date15 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Oct 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Past Answers to Present Concerns. The Relevance of the Premodern Past for 21st Century Policy Planners: Comments on the State of the Field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this