Patients with colorectal cancer A qualitative study of referral pathways and continuing care

Mark F. Harris*, Shane Pascoe, Lisa Crossland, Justin Beilby, Craig Veitch, Allan Spigelman, David Weller

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background
This article explores the views of general practitioners on their referral of colorectal cancer patients following diagnosis to specialist surgeons.

Methods
Sampling was purposive. Nineteen GPs representing urban and rural areas participated in four focus groups.

Results
General practitioners viewed their relationship with surgeons to be of prime importance in the decision about whom to refer. This relationship allowed faster referrals and improved feedback from the specialist to the GP. General practitioners preferred referral to the private health services because they perceived delays in the public system and that referral and communication was easier with private specialists. Neither the volume of colorectal cancer work nor the availability of a multidisciplinary team influenced their decision making.

Discussion
The relationship and communication between GP and surgeon are important in facilitating the referral pathway and the continuing role that many GPs would like to have in the care of their patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)899-902
Number of pages4
JournalAustralian family physician
Volume41
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

Keywords

  • OUTCOMES
  • SURVIVAL
  • general practitioners
  • qualitative research
  • GENERAL-PRACTICE
  • colorectal cancer
  • MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM
  • referral and consultation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patients with colorectal cancer A qualitative study of referral pathways and continuing care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this