Penal 'austerity': The doctrine of less eligibility reborn?

Richard Sparks*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Abstract

This chapter presents certain arguments and historical analogies which may assist in talcing a few preliminary sightings of some distinctive features of the British penal landscape. One of the more dispiriting features of the contemporary punitive turn is its apparent ignorance of its own historical antecedents. In 1939 Hermann Mannheim recorded and anatomized in The Dilemma of Penal Reform the hold which less eligibility exerted over all early carceral enterprises. Penality becomes one element among others in a modernizing political settlement. In the case outlined by David Garland of the reforming Liberal governments in Britain in the first years of the twentieth century the tenor of the period is set by the extension of the franchise, the institutionalization of labour disputes and the move towards universalism in welfare provision. The attraction of the privatization case depends on a distinction between the allocation of punishment by the state and the delivery of penal services by its delegated agents.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCorrectional Ethics
EditorsJohn Kleinig
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter18
Pages443-462
Number of pages20
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781315095387
ISBN (Print)9780754624318
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Feb 2006

Publication series

NameThe International Library of Essays in Public and Professional Ethics
PublisherRoutledge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Penal 'austerity': The doctrine of less eligibility reborn?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this