PERCEIVING THE ORDINARY: A STUDY OF EVERYDAY LANDSCAPES IN BELGIUM

Vincent Vanderheyden*, Dan Van der Horst, Anton Van Rompaey, Serge Schmitz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Landscape researchers have devoted relatively little attention to ordinary or everyday landscapes. This paper investigates differences in opinion about the attractiveness of these landscapes between groups of people according to their linguistic area and other socio-demographic characteristics. A survey of 1,542 Dutch and French speakers in Belgium using photo-questionnaires depicted the different types of Belgian rural landscape. Significant differences were observed regarding landscapes containing the same features, allowing to posit, to test, and to validate certain hypotheses. Dutch speakers found chessboard agrarian landscapes more attractive. Less educated participants felt more positive towards anthropogenic landscapes. Women were more attracted by farmed fields. Qualitative data added depth to the analysis, permitting to explore different ways in which people related to the landscape pictures. For a theoretical interpretation, we draw on Gibson's affordances theory and we revisit Larrere & Larrere's ways of looking at landscape theory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)591-603
Number of pages13
Journal Journal of Economic and Human Geography
Volume105
Issue number5
Early online date17 Dec 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • Ordinary landscapes
  • attractiveness
  • landscape preferences
  • affordances
  • ways of looking at landscapes
  • VISUAL PREFERENCES
  • SCENIC BEAUTY
  • PERCEPTIONS
  • QUALITY
  • NETHERLANDS
  • PLACE
  • SENSE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'PERCEIVING THE ORDINARY: A STUDY OF EVERYDAY LANDSCAPES IN BELGIUM'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this