Abstract
Landscape researchers have devoted relatively little attention to ordinary or everyday landscapes. This paper investigates differences in opinion about the attractiveness of these landscapes between groups of people according to their linguistic area and other socio-demographic characteristics. A survey of 1,542 Dutch and French speakers in Belgium using photo-questionnaires depicted the different types of Belgian rural landscape. Significant differences were observed regarding landscapes containing the same features, allowing to posit, to test, and to validate certain hypotheses. Dutch speakers found chessboard agrarian landscapes more attractive. Less educated participants felt more positive towards anthropogenic landscapes. Women were more attracted by farmed fields. Qualitative data added depth to the analysis, permitting to explore different ways in which people related to the landscape pictures. For a theoretical interpretation, we draw on Gibson's affordances theory and we revisit Larrere & Larrere's ways of looking at landscape theory.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 591-603 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Economic and Human Geography |
| Volume | 105 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 17 Dec 2013 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2014 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- Ordinary landscapes
- attractiveness
- landscape preferences
- affordances
- ways of looking at landscapes
- VISUAL PREFERENCES
- SCENIC BEAUTY
- PERCEPTIONS
- QUALITY
- NETHERLANDS
- PLACE
- SENSE