TY - JOUR
T1 - Perceptual, semantic, and pragmatic factors affect the derivation of contrastive inferences
AU - Ronderos, Camilo R.
AU - Aparicio, Helena
AU - Long, Madeleine
AU - Shukla, Vishakha
AU - Jara-Ettinger, Julian
AU - Rubio-Fernandez, Paula
N1 - C.R.R.: Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. H.A.: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. M.L.: Investigation, Visualization. V.S.: Data curation, Formal analysis. J.J.-E.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation. P.R.-F.: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - People derive contrastive inferences when interpreting adjectives (e.g., inferring that ‘the short pencil’ is being contrasted with a longer one). However, classic eye-tracking studies revealed contrastive inferences with scalar and material adjectives, but not with color adjectives. This was explained as a difference in listeners’ informativity expectations, since color adjectives are often used descriptively (hence not warranting a contrastive interpretation). Here we hypothesized that, beyond these pragmatic factors, perceptual factors (i.e., the relative perceptibility of color, material and scalar contrast) and semantic factors (i.e., the difference between gradable and non-gradable properties) also affect the real-time derivation of contrastive inferences. We tested these predictions in three languages with prenominal modification (English, Hindi, and Hungarian) and found that people derive contrastive inferences for color and scalar adjectives, but not for material adjectives. In addition, the processing of scalar adjectives was more context dependent than that of color and material adjectives, confirming that pragmatic, perceptual and semantic factors affect the derivation of contrastive inferences.
AB - People derive contrastive inferences when interpreting adjectives (e.g., inferring that ‘the short pencil’ is being contrasted with a longer one). However, classic eye-tracking studies revealed contrastive inferences with scalar and material adjectives, but not with color adjectives. This was explained as a difference in listeners’ informativity expectations, since color adjectives are often used descriptively (hence not warranting a contrastive interpretation). Here we hypothesized that, beyond these pragmatic factors, perceptual factors (i.e., the relative perceptibility of color, material and scalar contrast) and semantic factors (i.e., the difference between gradable and non-gradable properties) also affect the real-time derivation of contrastive inferences. We tested these predictions in three languages with prenominal modification (English, Hindi, and Hungarian) and found that people derive contrastive inferences for color and scalar adjectives, but not for material adjectives. In addition, the processing of scalar adjectives was more context dependent than that of color and material adjectives, confirming that pragmatic, perceptual and semantic factors affect the derivation of contrastive inferences.
KW - color adjectives
KW - contrastive inference
KW - material adjectives
KW - pragmatics
KW - scalar adjectives
KW - visual salience
UR - https://osf.io/apxtj/?view_only=285b127c526b4ef58491ae3d963d3735
U2 - 10.1162/opmi_a_00165
DO - 10.1162/opmi_a_00165
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85208171025
SN - 2470-2986
VL - 8
SP - 1213
EP - 1227
JO - Open Mind
JF - Open Mind
ER -