Abstract
Prediction of corporate failure is one of the major activities in auditing firms risks and uncertainties. The design of
reliable models to predict bankruptcy is crucial for many decision making processes. Although a large number of
models have been designed to predict bankruptcy, the relative performance evaluation of competing prediction
models remains an exercise that is unidimensional in nature,which often leads to reporting conflicting results. In
this research, we overcome this methodological issue by proposing an orientation-free super-efficiency data envelopment
analysis model as a multi-criteria assessment framework. Furthermore, we perform an exhaustive
comparative analysis of the most popular bankruptcy modeling frameworks for UK data including our own
models. In addition, we address two important research questions; namely, do some modeling frameworks performbetter
than others by design? and to what extent the choice and/or the design of explanatory variables and
their nature affect the performance of modeling frameworks?, and report on our findings.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 64-75 |
Journal | International Review of Financial Analysis |
Volume | 42 |
Early online date | 21 Jan 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2015 |
Keywords
- bankruptcy prediction
- performance criteria
- performance measures
- data envelopment analysis
- slacks-based measure
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Performance evaluation of bankruptcy prediction models: An orientation-free super-efficiency DEA-based framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Jamal Ouenniche
- Business School - Personal Chair in Business Analytics
- Management Science and Business Economics
- Edinburgh Strategic Resilience Initiative
- Credit Research Centre
- Management Science
Person: Academic: Research Active