Abstract
Human population growth, along with technological development and levels of consumption, is a key driver of our devastating impact on the environment. This must be acknowledged as a matter of urgency. Otherwise, we risk bequeathing future generations a tragic choice between introducing explicitly impermissible coercive population policies, becoming incapable of securing even basic human rights, and worsening climate change and other environmental damage. However, this chapter warns against approaching questions of population from too narrow an environmental ethics viewpoint. If this debate is conducted in isolation from considerations of global justice, there is a real danger of advocating policies that are plausible on the surface but impermissible when assessed in terms of their implicit impact on individual human lives.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics |
| Editors | Stephen M. Gardiner, Allen Thompson |
| Place of Publication | Oxford |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Chapter | 32 |
| Pages | 380-390 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780199941339, 9780190933388 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 8 Dec 2016 |
Publication series
| Name | Oxford Handbooks |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- population
- environmental ethics
- global justice
- circumstances of justice
- population-tied policies
- procreative rights
- ecological footprint
- IPAT
- equation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Population and environment: The impossible, the impermissible, and the imperative'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Elizabeth Cripps
- School of Social and Political Science - Senior Lecturer
Person: Academic: Research Active
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver