Abstract
Background
Breast-conserving surgery, adjuvant systemic therapy, and radiotherapy are the standard
of care for most women with early breast cancer. There are few reports of clinical
outcomes beyond the first decade of follow-up of randomised trials comparing breast-conserving
surgery with or without radiotherapy. We present a 30-year update of the Scottish
Breast Conservation Trial.
Methods
In this randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial across 14 hospitals in Scotland, women
aged younger than 70 years with early breast cancer (tumours ≤4 cm [T1 or T2 and N0
or N1]) were included. They underwent breast-conserving surgery (1 cm margin) with
axillary node sampling or clearance. Oestrogen receptor (ER)-rich patients (≥20 fmol/mg
protein) received 20 mg oral tamoxifen daily for 5 years. ER-poor patients (<20 fmol/mg
protein) received chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, methotrexate 50 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 every 21 days intravenously in eight courses). Stratification was by menstrual status
(within or more than 12 months from last menstrual period) and ER status (oestrogen
concentration ≥20 fmol/mg protein, <20 fmol/mg protein, or unknown) and patients were
randomly assigned (1:1) to high-dose (50 Gy in 20–25 fractions) local or locoregional
radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy. No blinding was possible due to the nature of
the treatment. We report the primary endpoint of the original trial, ipsilateral breast
tumour recurrence, and the co-primary endpoint, overall survival. Clinical outcomes
were compared by the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) are reported, with no radiotherapy
as the reference group. Failures of the proportional hazards assumption are reported
if significant. All analyses are by intention to treat.
Findings
Between April 1, 1985, and Oct 2, 1991, 589 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned
to the two treatment groups (293 to radiotherapy and 296 to no radiotherapy). After
exclusion of four ineligible patients (two in each group), there were 291 patients
in the radiotherapy group and 294 patients in the no radiotherapy group. Median follow-up
was 17·5 years (IQR 8·4–27·9). Ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence was significantly
lower in the radiotherapy group than in the no radiotherapy group (46 [16%] of 291
vs 107 [36%] of 294; HR 0·39 [95% CI 0·28–0·55], p<0·0001). Although there were differences
in the hazard rate for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence in the first decade after
treatment (HR 0·24 [95% CI 0·15–0·38], p<0·0001), subsequent risks of ipsilateral
breast tumour recurrence were similar in both groups (0·98 [0·54–1·79], p=0·95). There
was no difference in overall survival between the two groups (median 18·7 years [95%
CI 16·5–21·5] in the no radiotherapy group vs 19·2 years [16·9–21·3] in the radiotherapy group; HR 1·08 [95% CI 0·89–1 ·30], log-rank
p=0·43).
Interpretation
Our findings suggest that patients whose biology predicts a late relapse a decade
or more after breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer might gain little
from adjuvant radiotherapy.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | The Lancet Oncology |
Early online date | 7 Aug 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 7 Aug 2024 |