Prediction and failure of anti-angiogenesis escape

Takashi Mitamura, Charlie Gourley, Anil K Sood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Many clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of anti-angiogenesis therapy in the treatment of gynecologic cancer. However, these benefits have often been in terms of progression-free rather than overall survival and in some cases, the magnitude of benefit demonstrated in the pivotal phase 3 trials has been disappointing when compared with the percentage of patients who responded in earlier phase 2 trials. Two potential explanations for this are the current inability to stratify patients according to chance of benefit and the development of resistance mechanisms within the tumor. In this article, we review the prediction of response and the proposed resistance and escape mechanisms involved in anti-angiogenesis therapy, including the up-regulation of alternative proangiogenic pathways, vascular co-option, and resistance to hypoxia. These insights may offer a personalized strategy for anti-angiogenesis therapy and help us to consider the best selection of other therapies that should be combined with anti-angiogenesis therapy to improve the outcome of patients with gynecologic cancer.

Original languageEnglish
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2015


Dive into the research topics of 'Prediction and failure of anti-angiogenesis escape'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this