Preterm Birth and Childhood Wheezing Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jasper V. Been, Marlies J. Lugtenberg, Eline Smets, Constant P. Van Schayck, Boris W. Kramer, Monique Mommers, Aziz Sheikh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background

Accumulating evidence implicates early life factors in the aetiology of non-communicable diseases, including asthma/wheezing disorders. We undertook a systematic review investigating risks of asthma/wheezing disorders in children born preterm, including the increasing numbers who, as a result of advances in neonatal care, now survive very preterm birth.

Methods and Findings

Two reviewers independently searched seven online databases for contemporaneous (1 January 1995–23 September 2013) epidemiological studies investigating the association between preterm birth and asthma/wheezing disorders. Additional studies were identified through reference and citation searches, and contacting international experts. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Effective Public Health Practice Project instrument. We pooled unadjusted and adjusted effect estimates using random-effects meta-analysis, investigated “dose–response” associations, and undertook subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses to assess the robustness of associations.

We identified 42 eligible studies from six continents. Twelve were excluded for population overlap, leaving 30 unique studies involving 1,543,639 children. Preterm birth was associated with an increased risk of wheezing disorders in unadjusted (13.7% versus 8.3%; odds ratio [OR] 1.71, 95% CI 1.57–1.87; 26 studies including 1,500,916 children) and adjusted analyses (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.29–1.65; 17 studies including 874,710 children). The risk was particularly high among children born very preterm (<32 wk gestation; unadjusted: OR 3.00, 95% CI 2.61–3.44; adjusted: OR 2.81, 95% CI 2.55–3.12). Findings were most pronounced for studies with low risk of bias and were consistent across sensitivity analyses. The estimated population-attributable risk of preterm birth for childhood wheezing disorders was ≥3.1%.

Key limitations related to the paucity of data from low- and middle-income countries, and risk of residual confounding.

Conclusions

There is compelling evidence that preterm birth—particularly very preterm birth—increases the risk of asthma. Given the projected global increases in children surviving preterm births, research now needs to focus on understanding underlying mechanisms, and then to translate these insights into the development of preventive interventions.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1001596
Number of pages18
JournalPLoS Medicine
Volume11
Issue number1
Early online date28 Jan 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jan 2014

Keywords

  • Preterm birth
  • Asthma
  • Medical risk factors
  • Metaanalysis
  • Children
  • Critical care and emergency medicine
  • Pediatrics
  • Hospitals

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preterm Birth and Childhood Wheezing Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this