Prevalence of frailty and disability: findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

Catharine Gale, Cyrus Cooper, Avan Aihie Sayer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Objective: To examine the prevalence of frailty and disability in people aged 60 and over and the proportion of those with disabilities who receive help or use assistive devices.

Methods: Participants were 5450 people aged 60 and over from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Frailty was defined according to the Fried criteria. Participants were asked about difficulties with mobility or other everyday activities. Those with difficulties were asked whether they received help or used assistive devices.

Results: The overall weighted prevalence of frailty was 14%. Prevalence rose with increasing age, from 6.5% in those aged 60-69 years to 65% in those aged 90 or over. Frailty occurred more frequently in women than in men (16% versus 12%). Mobility difficulties were very common: 93% of frail individuals had such difficulties versus 58% of the non-frail. Among frail individuals, difficulties in performing activities or instrumental activities of daily living were reported by 57% and 64% respectively, versus 13% and 15% respectively among the non-frail. Among those with difficulties with mobility or other daily activities, 71% of frail individuals and 31% of non-frail individuals said that they received help. Of those with difficulties, 63% of frail individuals and 20% of non-frail individuals used a walking stick, but use of other assistive devices was uncommon.

Conclusions: Frailty becomes increasingly common in older age groups and is associated with a sizeable burden as regards difficulties with mobility and other everyday activities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)162-165
JournalAge and Ageing
Volume44
Issue number1
Early online date12 Oct 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence of frailty and disability: findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this