Prevalence of mental health conditions and relationship with general health in a whole-country population of people with intellectual disabilities compared with the general population

Laura A. Hughes-Mccormack, Ewelina Rydzewska, Angela Henderson, Cecilia MacIntyre, Julie Rintoul, Sally-Ann Cooper*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Background
There are no previous whole-country studies on mental health and relationships with general health in intellectual disability populations; study results vary.

Aims
To determine the prevalence of mental health conditions and relationships with general health in a total population with and without intellectual disabilities.

Method
Ninety-four per cent completed Scotland's Census 2011. Data on intellectual disabilities, mental health and general health were extracted, and the association between them was investigated.

Results
A total of 26 349/5 295 403 (0.5%) had intellectual disabilities. In total, 12.8% children, 23.4% adults and 27.2% older adults had mental health conditions compared with 0.3, 5.3 and 4.5% of the general population. Intellectual disabilities predicted mental health conditions; odds ratio (OR)=7.1 (95% CI 6.8–7.3). General health was substantially poorer and associated with mental health conditions; fair health OR=1.8 (95% CI 1.7–1.9), bad/very bad health OR=4.2 (95% CI 3.9–4.6).

Conclusions
These large-scale, whole-country study findings are important, given the previously stated lack of confidence in comparative prevalence results, and the need to plan services accordingly.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-248
Journal BJPsych Open
Volume3
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Sept 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence of mental health conditions and relationship with general health in a whole-country population of people with intellectual disabilities compared with the general population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this