Princípios e coerência na argumentação jurídica

Claudio Michelon

Princípios e coerência na argumentação jurídica

Translated title of the contribution: Principles and coherence in legal reasoning

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter (peer-reviewed) › peer-review

Abstract / Description of output

The central thesis of the paper is that all forms of legal reasoning from principles that can be understood as arguments grounded on coherence have a different (perhaps easier) underpinning political justification than those forms of utilization of principles that cannot be seen as springing from coherence (such as the notion of proportionality in the strict sense)

Translated title of the contribution	Principles and coherence in legal reasoning
Original language	Portuguese
Title of host publication	Direito e Interpretação
Subtitle of host publication	Racionalidade e Instituições
Editors	Ronald Porto Macedo Jr., Catarina Helena Cortada Barbieri
Publisher	Editora Saraiva
Number of pages	261
ISBN (Print)	9788502108035
Publication status	Published - 2011

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

coherence
legal reasoning
principles

1 Working paper

Princípios e Coerência na Argumentacião Jurídica: Principles and Coherence in Legal Reasoning
Michelon, C., 2009, SSRN: University of Edinburgh, School of Law, Working Papers, 38 p.
Research output: Working paper

Open Access
File

Cite this

@inbook{a34877cf78fe40ec8637301eb9bb24f2,

title = "Princ{\'i}pios e coer{\^e}ncia na argumenta{\c c}{\~a}o jur{\'i}dica",

abstract = "The central thesis of the paper is that all forms of legal reasoning from principles that can be understood as arguments grounded on coherence have a different (perhaps easier) underpinning political justification than those forms of utilization of principles that cannot be seen as springing from coherence (such as the notion of proportionality in the strict sense)",

keywords = "coherence, legal reasoning, principles",

author = "Claudio Michelon",

year = "2011",

language = "Portuguese",

isbn = "9788502108035",

editor = "{Porto Macedo Jr.}, Ronald and {Cortada Barbieri}, {Catarina Helena}",

booktitle = "Direito e Interpreta{\c c}{\~a}o",

publisher = "Editora Saraiva",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Princípios e coerência na argumentação jurídica

AU - Michelon, Claudio

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The central thesis of the paper is that all forms of legal reasoning from principles that can be understood as arguments grounded on coherence have a different (perhaps easier) underpinning political justification than those forms of utilization of principles that cannot be seen as springing from coherence (such as the notion of proportionality in the strict sense)

AB - The central thesis of the paper is that all forms of legal reasoning from principles that can be understood as arguments grounded on coherence have a different (perhaps easier) underpinning political justification than those forms of utilization of principles that cannot be seen as springing from coherence (such as the notion of proportionality in the strict sense)

KW - coherence

KW - legal reasoning

KW - principles

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9788502108035

BT - Direito e Interpretação

A2 - Porto Macedo Jr., Ronald

A2 - Cortada Barbieri, Catarina Helena

PB - Editora Saraiva

ER -

Princípios e coerência na argumentação jurídica

Abstract / Description of output

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

Fingerprint

Research output

Princípios e Coerência na Argumentacião Jurídica: Principles and Coherence in Legal Reasoning

Cite this