Probability, normalcy and the right against risk imposition

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Many philosophers accept that, as well as having a right that others not harm us, we also have a right that others not subject us to a risk of harm. And yet, when we attempt to spell out precisely what this ‘right against risk imposition’ involves, we encounter a series of notorious puzzles. Existing attempts to deal with these puzzles have tended to focus on the nature of rights – but I propose an approach that focusses instead on the nature of risk. The key move is to distinguish two different ways in which to conceptualise the risk that a given action presents – one of which is linked to the notion of probability and the other to the notion of normalcy.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Ethics and Social Philosophy
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 20 Aug 2023

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • risk imposition
  • probabilistic risk
  • normic risk


Dive into the research topics of 'Probability, normalcy and the right against risk imposition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this