Proof-relevant π-calculus: a constructive account of concurrency and causality

Roly Perera, James Cheney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We present a formalisation in Agda of the theory of concurrent transitions, residuation, and causal equivalence of traces for the π-calculus. Our formalisation employs de Bruijn indices and dependently-typed syntax, and aligns the “proved transitions” proposed by Boudol and Castellani in the context of CCS with the proof terms naturally present in Agda’s representation of the labelled transition relation. Our main contributions are proofs of the “diamond lemma” for the residuals of concurrent transitions and a formal definition of equivalence of traces up to permutation of transitions. In the π-calculus transitions represent propagating binders whenever their actions involve bound names. To accommodate these cases, we require a more general diamond lemma where the target states of equivalent traces are no longer identical, but are related by a braiding that rewires the bound and free names to reflect the particular interleaving of events involving binders. Our approach may be useful for modelling concurrency in other languages where transitions carry metadata sensitive to particular interleavings, such as dynamically allocated memory addresses.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages37
JournalMathematical Structures in Computer Science
Volume28
Issue number9
Early online date4 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Proof-relevant π-calculus: a constructive account of concurrency and causality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this