Abstract / Description of output
This article makes the case for reform of divorce law by demonstrating that the current provisions in the Divorce (Scotland) Act 1976 are not compliant with Article 8 ECHR. Scots law's mix of fault and no fault provisions requires the mandatory disclosure of often highly personal and intimate details in order to establish adultery, behaviour, or non-cohabitation. This statutory requirement to disclose private and personal information to the state, to fulfil the test for irretrievable breakdown of the marriage, constitutes an invasion of the spouses’ privacy. The article then goes on to show that such invasion cannot be justified as necessary in a democratic society, in terms of Article 8 jurisprudence. Consequently, reform is required to ensure that Scots divorce law is ECHR compliant. The final section sets out a proposal to transform divorce law in Scotland into a no-fault notification procedure, removing the damaging and invasive process currently in force.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 332-359 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | Edinburgh Law Review |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 30 Sept 2019 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- adultery
- Article 8
- behaviour
- divorce
- English law
- fault
- invasion of privacy
- irretrievable breakdown
- law reform
- no fault
- privacy
- Scots law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Protecting privacy in divorce actions: Article 8 and the need for law reform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Gillian Black
- School of Law - Commissioner of the Scottish Law Commission
- Edinburgh Centre for Private Law
Person: Academic: Research Active