TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychoeducational interventions in adolescent depression
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Bevan Jones, Rhys
AU - Thapar, Anita
AU - Stone, Zoe
AU - Thapar, Ajay
AU - Jones, Ian
AU - Smith, Daniel
AU - Simpson, Sharon
N1 - Funding Information:
RBJ was supported by a National Institute for Health Research/Health and Care Research Wales programme fellowship ( NIHR-FS-2012 ), and we thank the Welsh Government for its support. SS was supported by a MRC Strategic Award ( MC-PC-13027 , MC_UU_12017_14 , & SPHSU14 ). IJ is Director of the National Centre for Mental Health (NCMH) , and we thank the centre for its support. The authors have declared that they have no conflicts of interest.
Funding Information:
RBJ was supported by a National Institute for Health Research/Health and Care Research Wales programme fellowship (NIHR-FS-2012), and we thank the Welsh Government for its support. SS was supported by a MRC Strategic Award (MC-PC-13027, MC_UU_12017_14, & SPHSU14). IJ is Director of the National Centre for Mental Health (NCMH), and we thank the centre for its support. The authors have declared that they have no conflicts of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - Background: Adolescent depression is common and leads to distress and impairment for individuals/families. Treatment/prevention guidelines stress the need for good information and evidence-based psychosocial interventions. There has been growing interest in psychoeducational interventions (PIs), which broadly deliver accurate information about health issues and self-management. Objective, methods: Systematic search of targeted PIs as part of prevention/management approaches for adolescent depression. Searches were undertaken independently in PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, guidelines, reviews (including Cochrane), and reference lists. Key authors were contacted. No restrictions regarding publishing dates. Results: Fifteen studies were included: seven targeted adolescents with depression/depressive symptoms, eight targeted adolescents ‘at risk’ e.g. with a family history of depression. Most involved family/group programmes; others included individual, school-based and online approaches. PIs may affect understanding of depression, identification of symptoms, communication, engagement, and mental health outcomes. Conclusion, practice implications: PIs can have a role in preventing/managing adolescent depression, as a first-line or adjunctive approach. The limited number of studies, heterogeneity in formats and evaluation, and inconsistent approach to defining PI, make it difficult to compare programmes and measure overall effectiveness. Further work needs to establish an agreed definition of PI, develop/evaluate PIs in line with frameworks for complex interventions, and analyse their active components.
AB - Background: Adolescent depression is common and leads to distress and impairment for individuals/families. Treatment/prevention guidelines stress the need for good information and evidence-based psychosocial interventions. There has been growing interest in psychoeducational interventions (PIs), which broadly deliver accurate information about health issues and self-management. Objective, methods: Systematic search of targeted PIs as part of prevention/management approaches for adolescent depression. Searches were undertaken independently in PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, guidelines, reviews (including Cochrane), and reference lists. Key authors were contacted. No restrictions regarding publishing dates. Results: Fifteen studies were included: seven targeted adolescents with depression/depressive symptoms, eight targeted adolescents ‘at risk’ e.g. with a family history of depression. Most involved family/group programmes; others included individual, school-based and online approaches. PIs may affect understanding of depression, identification of symptoms, communication, engagement, and mental health outcomes. Conclusion, practice implications: PIs can have a role in preventing/managing adolescent depression, as a first-line or adjunctive approach. The limited number of studies, heterogeneity in formats and evaluation, and inconsistent approach to defining PI, make it difficult to compare programmes and measure overall effectiveness. Further work needs to establish an agreed definition of PI, develop/evaluate PIs in line with frameworks for complex interventions, and analyse their active components.
KW - Adolescence
KW - Depression
KW - Prevention
KW - Psychoeducation/education
KW - Treatment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85032900076
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2017.10.015
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2017.10.015
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29103882
AN - SCOPUS:85032900076
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 101
SP - 804
EP - 816
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
IS - 5
ER -