Pulmonary embolism diagnosis: clinical assessment at the front door

John Cafferkey, Philippa Serebriakoff, Kerstin de Wit, Daniel E Horner, Matthew James Reed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

This first of two practice reviews addresses pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis considering important aspects of PE clinical presentation and comparing evidence-based PE testing strategies. A companion paper addresses the management of PE. Symptoms and signs of PE are varied, and emergency physicians frequently use testing to 'rule out' the diagnosis in people with respiratory or cardiovascular symptoms. The emergency clinician must balance the benefit of reassuring negative PE testing with the risks of iatrogenic harms from over investigation and overdiagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberemermed-2021-212000
Pages (from-to)945-951
JournalEmergency Medicine Journal
Issue number12
Early online date22 Jul 2022
Publication statusPublished - 22 Nov 2022

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • diagnosis
  • emergency care systems
  • pulmonary embolism
  • thrombo-embolic disease


Dive into the research topics of 'Pulmonary embolism diagnosis: clinical assessment at the front door'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this