Pyrotechnic Cities: Architecture, Fire Safety and Standardisation

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Abstract / Description of output

This book explores the relationship between architecture, government and fire. It posits that, through the question of fire-safety standardisation, building design comes to be both a problem for, and a tool of, government. Through a close study of fire-safety standards it demonstrates the shaping effect that architecture and the city have on the way we think about governing.

Opening with an investigation into the Grenfell Tower fire and the political actors who sought to enrol it in programmes of governmental reform, contextualising the research in current literature, the book takes four city studies, each beginning with a specific historic fire: The 1654 Great Fire of Meirecki, Edo; the 1877 town fire of Lagos; the 1911 Empire Palace Theatre fire, Edinburgh; and the 2001 World Trade Centre attack, New York. Each study identifies the governmental response to the fire, safety standards and codes designed in its wake and how these new processes spread and change.

Drawing on the work of sociologists John Law and Anne Marie Mol and their concept of ‘Fire Space’, it describes the way that architectural design, through the medium of fire, is an instrument of political agency. Pyrotechnic Cities is a critical investigation into these political implications, written for academics, researchers and students in architectural history and theory, infrastructure studies and governance.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Number of pages256
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9781003026297
ISBN (Print)9780367459673
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jun 2022

Publication series

NameRoutledge Research in Architecture

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • architecture
  • fire-safety
  • infrastructure
  • governmentality
  • regulatory space

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pyrotechnic Cities: Architecture, Fire Safety and Standardisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this