One unsettled analytical question in race scholarship concerns the relationship between categories of race and categories of post-colonialism. These are often run together or are used interchangeably; sometimes an implicit hierarchy of one over the other is assumed without explicit discussion. In that activity, a great deal is enveloped, including a portrayal of race scholarship which can be at some variance from how race scholars conceive it. In this paper, it is argued that paying attention to a distinction between these two categories, and then trying to get them not only in the “right order”, but also on their own terms, is conceptually fruitful – however messy the outcome may be. What is advocated is an approach in which categories of race and post-colonialism are not subsumed into one another, but retain their distinctive and explanatory power.
|Number of pages||19|
|Journal||Ethnic and Racial Studies|
|Early online date||15 Jan 2018|
|Publication status||Published - May 2018|
FingerprintDive into the research topics of '‘Race’ and ‘post-colonialism’: Should one come before the other?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- School of Social and Political Science - Personal Chair of Race, Identity and Citizenship
Person: Academic: Research Active