Abstract
Moser’s vision for philosophy has both a positive and a negative component. The positive component is a reorientation of philosophical practice around wisdom and moral transformation; the negative component is a criticism of much philosophy, including natural theology, as being at odds with this. Moser has leveled a challenge to produce a plausible piece of natural theology that is not deficient in this respect. Here I attempt to do exactly that. I defend a version of the moral argument that does not presuppose moral realism of any sort.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | EPS Symposium on Paul Moser |
| Publisher | Evangelical Philosophical Society |
| Pages | 1-18 |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |