TY - JOUR
T1 - Rapid Acute Coronary Syndrome Evaluation Over One Hour With High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I
T2 - A United States-Based Stepped-Wedge, Randomized Trial
AU - RACE-IT Research Group
AU - Miller, Joseph
AU - Cook, Bernard
AU - Gandolfo, Chaun
AU - Mills, Nicholas L
AU - Mahler, Simon
AU - Levy, Phillip
AU - Parikh, Sachin
AU - Krupp, Seth
AU - Nour, Khaled
AU - Klausner, Howard
AU - Gindi, Ryan
AU - Lewandowski, Aaron
AU - Hudson, Michael
AU - Perrotta, Giuseppe
AU - Zweig, Bryan
AU - Lanfear, David
AU - Kim, Henry
AU - Dangoulian, Shooshan
AU - Tang, Amy
AU - Todter, Erika
AU - Khan, Altaf
AU - Keerie, Catriona
AU - Bole, Shane
AU - Nasseredine, Hashem
AU - Oudeif, Ahmed
AU - Abou Asala, Elian
AU - Mohammed, Mustafa
AU - Kazem, Ahmed
AU - Malette, Kelly
AU - Singh-Kucukarslan, Gulmohar
AU - Xu, Nicole
AU - Wittenberg, Sophie
AU - Morton, Thayer
AU - Gunaga, Satheesh
AU - Affas, Ziad
AU - Tabbaa, Kutiba
AU - Desai, Parth
AU - Alsaadi, Ayman
AU - Mahmood, Shazil
AU - Schock, Andrew
AU - Konowitz, Nicholas
AU - Fuchs, Joshua
AU - Joyce, Kate
AU - Shamoun, Lance
AU - Babel, Jacob
AU - Broome, Andrew
AU - Digiacinto, Geoffrey
AU - Shaheen, Elizabeth
AU - Darnell, Gale
AU - Muller, Gregory
AU - Heath, Gerard
AU - Bills, Gust
AU - Vieder, Jason
AU - Rockoff, Steven
AU - Kim, Brian
AU - Colucci, Anthony
AU - Plemmons, Elizabeth
AU - McCord, James
N1 - Copyright © 2024 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/6/15
Y1 - 2024/6/15
N2 - STUDY OBJECTIVE: The real-world effectiveness and safety of a 0/1-hour accelerated protocol using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) to exclude myocardial infarction (MI) compared to routine care in the United States is uncertain. The objective was to compare a 0/1-hour accelerated protocol for evaluation of MI to a 0/3-hour standard care protocol.METHODS: The RACE-IT trial was a stepped-wedge, randomized trial across 9 emergency departments (EDs) that enrolled 32,609 patients evaluated for possible MI from July 2020 through April 2021. Patients undergoing high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I testing with concentrations less than or equal to 99th percentile were included. Patients who had MI excluded by the 0/1-hour protocol could be discharged from the ED. Patients in the standard care protocol had 0- and 3-hour troponin testing and application of a modified HEART score to be eligible for discharge. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients discharged from the ED without 30-day death or MI.RESULTS: There were 13,505 and 19,104 patients evaluated in the standard care and accelerated protocol groups, respectively, of whom 19,152 (58.7%) were discharged directly from the ED. There was no significant difference in safe discharges between standard care and the accelerated protocol (59.5% vs 57.8%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95 to 1.16). At 30 days, there were 90 deaths or MIs with 38 (0.4%) in the standard care group and 52 (0.4%) in the accelerated protocol group (aOR=0.84, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.68).CONCLUSION: A 0/1-hour accelerated protocol using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I did not lead to more safe ED discharges compared with standard care.
AB - STUDY OBJECTIVE: The real-world effectiveness and safety of a 0/1-hour accelerated protocol using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) to exclude myocardial infarction (MI) compared to routine care in the United States is uncertain. The objective was to compare a 0/1-hour accelerated protocol for evaluation of MI to a 0/3-hour standard care protocol.METHODS: The RACE-IT trial was a stepped-wedge, randomized trial across 9 emergency departments (EDs) that enrolled 32,609 patients evaluated for possible MI from July 2020 through April 2021. Patients undergoing high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I testing with concentrations less than or equal to 99th percentile were included. Patients who had MI excluded by the 0/1-hour protocol could be discharged from the ED. Patients in the standard care protocol had 0- and 3-hour troponin testing and application of a modified HEART score to be eligible for discharge. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients discharged from the ED without 30-day death or MI.RESULTS: There were 13,505 and 19,104 patients evaluated in the standard care and accelerated protocol groups, respectively, of whom 19,152 (58.7%) were discharged directly from the ED. There was no significant difference in safe discharges between standard care and the accelerated protocol (59.5% vs 57.8%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95 to 1.16). At 30 days, there were 90 deaths or MIs with 38 (0.4%) in the standard care group and 52 (0.4%) in the accelerated protocol group (aOR=0.84, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.68).CONCLUSION: A 0/1-hour accelerated protocol using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I did not lead to more safe ED discharges compared with standard care.
U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.04.024
DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.04.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 38888531
SN - 0196-0644
JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine
JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine
ER -