Reasoning with metalevel argumentation frameworks in aspartix

Nadin Kokciyan; Isabel Sassoon; Anthony P. Young; Sanjay Modgil; Simon Parsons

doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-463

Reasoning with metalevel argumentation frameworks in aspartix

Nadin Kokciyan^*
, Isabel Sassoon
, Anthony P. Young
, Sanjay Modgil
, Simon Parsons

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

In this demo paper, we propose an encoding for Metalevel Argumentation Frameworks (MAFs) to be used in Aspartix, an Answer Set Programming (ASP) approach to find the justified arguments of an AF. MAFs provide a uniform encoding of object level Dung Frameworks and extensions thereof that include values, preferences and attacks on attacks (EAFs). The justification status of arguments in the object level AF can then be evaluated and explained through evaluation of the arguments in the MAF. The demo includes multiple examples from the literature to show the applicability of our proposed encoding for translating various object level AFs to the uniform language of MAFs.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018
Editors	Sanjay Modgil, Katarzyna Budzynska, John Lawrence
Publisher	IOS Press
Pages	463-464
Number of pages	2
ISBN (Electronic)	978-1-61499-906-5
ISBN (Print)	978-1-61499-905-8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-463
Publication status	Published - 14 Sept 2018
Event	7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2018 - Warsaw, Poland Duration: 12 Sept 2018 → 14 Sept 2018

Publication series

Name	Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Publisher	IOS Press
Volume	305
ISSN (Print)	0922-6389
ISSN (Electronic)	1879-8314

Conference

Conference	7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2018
Country/Territory	Poland
City	Warsaw
Period	12/09/18 → 14/09/18

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

Computational argumentation
Metalevel argumentation frameworks

Access to Document

10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-463Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution Non-Commercial (CC-BY-NC)

Reasoning with Metalevel_KOKCIYAN_DOA25062018_VOR_CC-BY-NCFinal published version, 111 KBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution Non-Commercial (CC-BY-NC)

http://ebooks.iospress.nl/volumearticle/50225Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution Non-Commercial (CC-BY-NC)

Cite this

Kokciyan, N., Sassoon, I., Young, A. P., Modgil, S., & Parsons, S. (2018). Reasoning with metalevel argumentation frameworks in aspartix. In S. Modgil, K. Budzynska, & J. Lawrence (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018 (pp. 463-464). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 305). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-463

@inproceedings{a9915cbca1a140a484cf3f9ad0c82e32,

title = "Reasoning with metalevel argumentation frameworks in aspartix",

abstract = "In this demo paper, we propose an encoding for Metalevel Argumentation Frameworks (MAFs) to be used in Aspartix, an Answer Set Programming (ASP) approach to find the justified arguments of an AF. MAFs provide a uniform encoding of object level Dung Frameworks and extensions thereof that include values, preferences and attacks on attacks (EAFs). The justification status of arguments in the object level AF can then be evaluated and explained through evaluation of the arguments in the MAF. The demo includes multiple examples from the literature to show the applicability of our proposed encoding for translating various object level AFs to the uniform language of MAFs.",

keywords = "Computational argumentation, Metalevel argumentation frameworks",

author = "Nadin Kokciyan and Isabel Sassoon and Young, \{Anthony P.\} and Sanjay Modgil and Simon Parsons",

year = "2018",

month = sep,

day = "14",

doi = "10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-463",

language = "English",

isbn = " 978-1-61499-905-8",

series = "Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications",

publisher = "IOS Press",

pages = "463--464",

editor = "Sanjay Modgil and Katarzyna Budzynska and John Lawrence",

booktitle = "Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018",

address = "United States",

note = "7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2018 ; Conference date: 12-09-2018 Through 14-09-2018",

}

Kokciyan, N, Sassoon, I, Young, AP, Modgil, S & Parsons, S 2018, Reasoning with metalevel argumentation frameworks in aspartix. in S Modgil, K Budzynska & J Lawrence (eds), Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 305, IOS Press, pp. 463-464, 7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2018, Warsaw, Poland, 12/09/18. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-463

Reasoning with metalevel argumentation frameworks in aspartix. / Kokciyan, Nadin; Sassoon, Isabel; Young, Anthony P. et al.
Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018. ed. / Sanjay Modgil; Katarzyna Budzynska; John Lawrence. IOS Press, 2018. p. 463-464 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 305).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Reasoning with metalevel argumentation frameworks in aspartix

AU - Kokciyan, Nadin

AU - Sassoon, Isabel

AU - Young, Anthony P.

AU - Modgil, Sanjay

AU - Parsons, Simon

PY - 2018/9/14

Y1 - 2018/9/14

N2 - In this demo paper, we propose an encoding for Metalevel Argumentation Frameworks (MAFs) to be used in Aspartix, an Answer Set Programming (ASP) approach to find the justified arguments of an AF. MAFs provide a uniform encoding of object level Dung Frameworks and extensions thereof that include values, preferences and attacks on attacks (EAFs). The justification status of arguments in the object level AF can then be evaluated and explained through evaluation of the arguments in the MAF. The demo includes multiple examples from the literature to show the applicability of our proposed encoding for translating various object level AFs to the uniform language of MAFs.

AB - In this demo paper, we propose an encoding for Metalevel Argumentation Frameworks (MAFs) to be used in Aspartix, an Answer Set Programming (ASP) approach to find the justified arguments of an AF. MAFs provide a uniform encoding of object level Dung Frameworks and extensions thereof that include values, preferences and attacks on attacks (EAFs). The justification status of arguments in the object level AF can then be evaluated and explained through evaluation of the arguments in the MAF. The demo includes multiple examples from the literature to show the applicability of our proposed encoding for translating various object level AFs to the uniform language of MAFs.

KW - Computational argumentation

KW - Metalevel argumentation frameworks

U2 - 10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-463

DO - 10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-463

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85053886997

SN - 978-1-61499-905-8

T3 - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

SP - 463

EP - 464

BT - Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018

A2 - Modgil, Sanjay

A2 - Budzynska, Katarzyna

A2 - Lawrence, John

PB - IOS Press

T2 - 7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2018

Y2 - 12 September 2018 through 14 September 2018

ER -

Reasoning with metalevel argumentation frameworks in aspartix

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this