Recent Developments to Promote Transparency and Public Participation in Investment Treaty Arbitration

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

In the past, concerns have been expressed about the secrecy of international treaty arbitration. This paper attempts to show how the investment treaty arbitration system has responded to these criticisms. It starts by reviewing the arguments in favour of transparency and what different forms transparency can take in the context of investment treaty arbitration. The paper then sketches out the main developments in relation to transparency and highlights key issues that still remain to be resolved. In conclusion it is noted that the extent of publicity and public participation in a particular arbitration will depend on the instrument under which the claim is being brought. Whilst a small number of states have sought to promote the transparency agenda in their investment treaties, more could be done by the majority of states.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationSSRN
PublisherUniversity of Edinburgh, School of Law, Working Papers
Volume2011/01
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jan 2011

Keywords

  • international investment law
  • investment treaty arbitration
  • amicus curiae briefs
  • transparency
  • secrecy
  • publicity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recent Developments to Promote Transparency and Public Participation in Investment Treaty Arbitration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this