Abstract
Wikidata is the only general-purpose open knowledge graph with the capability of specifying references for every single statement. Currently, about 68% of Wikidata statements have at least one reference but the quality of these references is rarely covered in data quality studies. There is also a lack of a comprehensive framework for evaluating references. In this paper, we investigate the statistics of Wikidata references in 6 topical subsets of Wikidata. We compare these statistics over two Wikidata dumps; one from 2016 and one from 2021.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 2nd Wikidata Workshop (Wikidata 2021) |
| Editors | Lucie-Aimée Kaffee, Simon Razniewski, Aidan Hogan |
| Publisher | CEUR-WS.org |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Publication status | Published - 24 Oct 2021 |
| Event | 2nd Wikidata Workshop - Virtual, Online Duration: 24 Oct 2021 → 24 Oct 2021 https://wikidataworkshop.github.io/2021/ |
Conference
| Conference | 2nd Wikidata Workshop |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | Wikidata 2021 |
| City | Virtual, Online |
| Period | 24/10/21 → 24/10/21 |
| Internet address |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- Data quality
- Gene Wiki
- Reference quality
- Topical subset
- Wikidata
- WikiProject
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reference statistics in wikidata topical subsets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver