Abstract
Reflexivity is fundamental to qualitative health research, yet notoriously difficult to unpack. Drawing on Wilfred Bion's work on the development of the capacity to think and to learn, I show how the capacity to think is an impermanent and fallible capacity, with the potential to materialize or evaporate at any number of different points. I use this conceptualization together with examples from published interview data to illustrate the difficulties for researchers attempting to sustain a reflexive approach, and to direct attention toward the possibilities for recovering and supporting the capacity to think. I counter some of the criticisms suggesting that reflexivity can be self-indulgent, and suggest instead that self-indulgence constitutes a failure of reflexivity. In the concluding discussions I acknowledge tensions accompanying the use of psychoanalytic theories for research purposes, and point to emerging psychosocial approaches as one way of negotiating these.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 248-255 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Qualitative Health Research |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2013 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- communication
- reflexivity
- relationships, research
- research, qualitative
- self
- QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
- RESEARCHER