TY - JOUR
T1 - Regulating for trustworthy autonomous systems
T2 - exploring stakeholder perspectives on answerability
AU - Hatherall, Louise
AU - Sethi, Nayha
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Law and Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cardiff University (CU).
PY - 2024/12/1
Y1 - 2024/12/1
N2 - The proliferation of autonomous and semi-autonomous systems (AS) poses important and pressing regulatory challenges. Underpinning these is the recognition that many different stakeholders will need to trust systems to ensure their effective adoption and implementation. However, research on stakeholder perspectives is lacking, and assessing trustworthiness is difficult due to ‘responsibility gaps’ where it is unclear where responsibility for harms arising from AS ought to lie. Bridging these gaps is important because holding one another responsible is how social trust is maintained, and trust is vital to unlocking the promise that AS hold. This article considers how the concept of answerability could provide a useful framework for boosting the trustworthiness of AS. We present findings from a series of stakeholder interviews identifying what answers different stakeholders need to trust AS in health, finance, and government applications, and consider the implications of our research for current proposals for regulating AS in the United Kingdom and the European Union.
AB - The proliferation of autonomous and semi-autonomous systems (AS) poses important and pressing regulatory challenges. Underpinning these is the recognition that many different stakeholders will need to trust systems to ensure their effective adoption and implementation. However, research on stakeholder perspectives is lacking, and assessing trustworthiness is difficult due to ‘responsibility gaps’ where it is unclear where responsibility for harms arising from AS ought to lie. Bridging these gaps is important because holding one another responsible is how social trust is maintained, and trust is vital to unlocking the promise that AS hold. This article considers how the concept of answerability could provide a useful framework for boosting the trustworthiness of AS. We present findings from a series of stakeholder interviews identifying what answers different stakeholders need to trust AS in health, finance, and government applications, and consider the implications of our research for current proposals for regulating AS in the United Kingdom and the European Union.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208505596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jols.12501
DO - 10.1111/jols.12501
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85208505596
SN - 0263-323X
VL - 51
SP - 586
EP - 609
JO - Journal of Law and Society
JF - Journal of Law and Society
IS - 4
ER -