Relative costs of offspring sex and offspring survival in a polygynous mammal

Craig Walling, Hannah Froy, Josephine Pemberton, Tim H. Clutton-Brock, Loeske Kruuk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Costs of reproduction are expected to be ubiquitous in wild animal populations, and understanding the drivers of variation in these costs is an important aspect of life-history evolution theory. We use a 43-year dataset from a wild population of red deer to examine the relative importance of two factors that influence the costs of reproduction to mothers, and to test whether these costs vary with changing ecological conditions. Like previous studies, our analyses indicate fitness costs of lactation: mothers whose calves survived the summer subsequently showed lower survival and fecundity than those whose calves died soon after birth, accounting for 5% and 14% of the variation in mothers’ survival and fecundity, respectively. The production of a male calf depressed maternal survival and fecundity more than production of a female, but accounted for <1% of the variation in either fitness component. There was no evidence for any change in the effect of calf survival or sex with increasing population density.
Original languageEnglish
Article number20160417
JournalBiology letters
Volume12
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Sep 2016

Keywords

  • Cost of reproduction
  • sex allocation
  • Cervus elaphus
  • wild ungulate population

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relative costs of offspring sex and offspring survival in a polygynous mammal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this