Reply to "Comment on 'Lattice determination of Sigma-Lambda mixing'"

QCDSF-UKQCD Collaboration, R. Horsley*, J. Najjar, Y. Nakamura, H. Perlt, D. Pleiter, P. E. L. Rakow, G. Schierholz, A. Schiller, H. Stueben, J. M. Zanotti

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review


In this Reply, we respond to the Comment [Phys. Rev. D 92, 018501 (2015)]. Our computation [Phys. Rev. D 91, 074512 (2015)] only took into account pure QCD effects, arising from quark mass differences, so it is not surprising that there are discrepancies in isospin splittings and in the Sigma-Lambda mixing angle. We expect that these discrepancies will be smaller in a full calculation incorporating QED effects.

Original languageEnglish
Article number018502
Number of pages3
JournalPhysical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2015




Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to "Comment on 'Lattice determination of Sigma-Lambda mixing'"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this