INTRODUCTION: If health professionals are to involve major stroke patients and their families in making decisions about treatments, they need to describe prognosis in terms that are easily understood. We suggest that referring to "specific abilities", such as ability to be independent, walk, talk, eat normally, be continent, live without severe pain, live without major anxiety or depression and to live at home may be more easily understood than terms such as disabled based on the modified Rankin scale (mRs).

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the "specific abilities" and quality of life of patients in each mRs level at six months after major stroke.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study of patients admitted to hospital with major stroke with follow up at six months.

RESULTS: We recruited 403 patients, mean age 77.5yrs. The number (%) in each mRs level at six months was 0 (no problems): 8(2%), 1: 45(11.2%), 2: 7(1.7%), 3: 149(37.1%), 4: 46(11.4%), 5: 36(9.0%) and 6(dead) 111(27.6%). Patients within each mRs level varied with respect to their "specific abilities" and quality of life. For example, of the 36(9%) patients with mRs 5, 30(83%) could talk, 14(39%) were continent, 33(92%) were not in severe pain, 22(61%) did not have major anxiety/depression and 5(14%) could live at home. Their median utility (derived from HRQoL) was -0.08 (range -0.35 to 0.43).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Describing prognosis with the mRs does not convey the variation in specific abilities and HRQoL amongst patients with major stroke. Therefore, describing prognosis in terms of "specific abilities" may be more appropriate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104993
JournalJournal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
Issue number8
Early online date13 Jun 2020
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Jun 2020


Dive into the research topics of 'Reporting "specific abilities" after major stroke to better describe prognosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this