Projects per year
Critical to the issue are the definitions used to define the various levels of reproducibility, and agreement on a standardized badging scheme that can be applied in the publishing process (and perhaps used as a currency in the academic rewards culture). As publishers and researchers begin to implement reproducibility practices, recognition and reward schemes and the related taxonomies are developing on an ad hoc basis, creating a need for some standardization.
This recommended practice is an effort to develop common recognition practices, vocabulary, and iconography used to facilitate the sharing of data and methods.
|Publisher||National Information Standards Organization (NISO)|
|Number of pages||20|
|Publication status||Published - 28 Jan 2021|
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Reproducibility Badging and Definitions: A Recommended Practice of the National Information Standards Organization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Reproducibility and research integrity inquiry - Written Evidence Submitted by the Software Sustainability Institute (RRE0038)
Neil Chue Hong (Contributor)30 Sep 2021
Activity: Consultancy types › Providing oral or written evidence for non-academic board, committee, working group or advisory panelFile
Neil Chue Hong (Member)18 Apr 2019 → …
Activity: Membership types › Membership of public/government advisory/policy group or panel