Residuality and inconsistency in the interpretation of socio-theoretical systems

Christoforos Bouzanis, Stephen Kemp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article addresses the interpretation and criticism of theoretical systems. Its particular focus is on how to assess the success of theories in dealing with some specific phenomenon. We are interested in how to differentiate between cases where a theory offers an unsatisfactory acknowledgment of a specified phenomenon and those where a theory offers a deeper, more systematic understanding. We address these metatheoretical issues by developing Parsons’s analysis of positive and residual categories in various respects, including a focus on mutual support as the basis of positivity, differentiating synectic (reconcilable) and antinomic (irreconcilable) residual categories, and distinguishing divisions that are central to systems from those between center and periphery. We also consider how this conceptual toolkit can be put into practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-292
Number of pages11
JournalSociological Theory
Volume37
Issue number3
Early online date29 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019

Keywords

  • residual categories
  • theoretical system
  • talcott parsons
  • consistency
  • metatheory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Residuality and inconsistency in the interpretation of socio-theoretical systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this